Pretty much any guy who dances is used to being outnumbered by women. But for Chris Klein, a student at St. John's University who was recently profiled in the Wall Street Journal, that differential is particularly intense: He's the only man on the school's dance team. And the dance team world as a whole is almost universally female.
The WSJ quotes UDA program director Catherine Morris saying that the number of guys on dance teams hovers around 5%; I'd wager it's even smaller. For people like Chris, that means good things and bad things. Good, in that they're pretty much guaranteed to get extra attention wherever the team goes. Bad, in that they might not ever quite fit in.
But about not fitting in: I've frequently wondered why there weren't more guys on dance teams. The WSJ story talks about issues involving pom work and costumes—but are those really so insurmountable? And while dance teamers should never be confused with cheerleaders, it's true that dudes have been on cheerleading teams for years. What if the guy-girl ratio were more even? Would it ruin the whole dance team aesthetic? Or would adding a bunch of men—assuming, of course, that they were as technically strong as the ladies—take things to a new level?